Alien: Covenant (2017) Review

Published by: Anthony Wallace


IMG_20170323_0950491It was 38 years ago that movie watchers were introduced to ‘Alien‘ back in 1979. Director Ridley Scott would go on to terrify audiences with a gut wrenching, hair raising cat and mouse game when space truckers encounter a deadly beast in deep space. A first of its kind that would spawn rip-offs that pales in comparison to a horror masterpiece. Then 33 years later, Scott would return to the universe that solidified his career with 2012’s ‘Prometheus‘. His return was met with praise and frustration as the movie had high production value but lacked in answering it’s big questions.

This now leads us to the follow-up in ‘Alien: Covenant‘ where Ridley Scott promises to bring back the Xenomorphs and the carnage fans came to love. And he also provides answers to the many lingering pains that were left unanswered in ‘Prometheus‘. After months and months of anticipation the time has finally arrived where fans look forward to a much needed Alien sequel. What one has to wonder is if fans will be satisfied for what has been a tumultuous journey up to this point.

xEMPIRE_AC_PAGE_73_CROP_1.jpg.pagespeed.ic.bQn51ps3b0

As a colony ship, the Covenant, advances towards its destination of a new home they are hit by a neutrino burst. The crew awakens from cryo-sleep to then intercept a signal from a nearby planet that closely resembles earth. While investigating this new world they discover what turns out to be a deadly game of survival when death and chaos awaits their arrival. The film stars Katherine Waterston, Michael Fassbender, Billy Crudup, and Danny McBride.

I was in the minority of those who enjoyed ‘Prometheus‘ and praised the direction and production that was put into the project. The idea of the Engineers was clever as it brought about the idea of creators of mankind who then turn on their creation. Michael Fassbender’s David makes a strong presence as the newly created android by the Weyland Corporation as his ability to be curious takes on a life of its own. Going into ‘Alien: Covenant‘ I was looking forward to another strong performance by Michael Fassbender as this time around he plays not only David but the Covenant’s new android Walter.v1.bjsxNTM1OTU4O2o7MTczNDI7MTIwMDs0NjYyOzMxMzk

The way to describe ‘Alien: Covenant‘ is a little frustrating because as much as it tries to be an Alien movie it also tries being a sequel to ‘Prometheus‘. And a lot of it has to do with Ridley Scott trying to appease the fan bases in both camps. Starting with the positives the movie is beautiful to look at. If there’s one thing everyone can agree on is that Ridley Scott knows how to produce and direct. From the external shots of the Covenant ship to the landscapes of the Engineer’s home world they are breathtaking to watch. Even the cast do a decent job while falling one by one to deadly pathogens.

Lead actress Katherine Waterston plays the distressed co-captain alongside Billy Crudup’s Oram. The director’s belief in casting strong females for the role has proven to be true as was the case of Sigourney Weaver. Except she isn’t meant to surpass Weaver’s performance in the franchise rather to demonstrate the tenacity as she fights for her life. Unfortunately, a large chunk of the runtime is dedicated to Michael Fassbender’s David/Walter as he continues to explore the idea of creation. But that’s what saves the film from floundering into familiar gasps and terror. David takes things to the next level and that’s when he truly becomes a terrifying menace.

Unknown

Now we come to the difficult part because as much as we’re entertained by Michael Fassbender and the visual prowess of Ridley Scott, the film struggles to balance in tone. When we explore the terrain of an uncharted paradise it’s hard not to forget ‘Prometheus‘ and the scientific expedition that took place as they journey to find humanity’s origins. Then there comes a point when the monsters arrive, a.k.a the back-burster, and the many other creatures that show up in the film. The creatures almost seemed to take the backseat or were merely around to make an appearance. A good chunk of the film glides around the questions of the Engineers and how David survives a hostile environment. There never were smooth transitions between the terror and the grand ideas set by the script. It’s unfortunate because the lack of substance behind the Engineers is something I was hoping to see more of.

ac_050_00194666_novyy-razmer

There’s going to be disappointment and that’s because the script tries to please everyone but not in a satisfying way that we’d hope. Great performances by the cast; more specifically Michael Fassbender and even the one and only Danny McBride. There are terrifying moments in the movie and I wouldn’t even say its the aliens themselves. If you were put off by the religious and scientific garble in ‘Prometheus‘ then don’t expect it to go away. In fact, it may be more blatant as the movie does explore the ideas of heaven and hell. If you’re a fan of the aliens then you will also be disappointed because their mysterious beginnings may spoil the lore that fans have enjoyed for many years.

images

It may take subsequent viewings to change my perspective on ‘Alien: Covenant‘ as time goes on. But in the way I was thoroughly in awe of ‘Prometheus‘ on its first viewing it may be a tough mountain to climb. This is not an easy review because although I tried not to go in with expectations I still ended up feeling somewhat let down. The last thing I will mention is the sound score by Jed Kurzel. He did a great job by mixing in the sound of Jerry Goldsmith’sAlien‘ with this movie. There was a great use of buildup when things started going awry. It made me feel like we returned to Ridley Scott’s world and bringing back memories of how great the original ‘Alien‘ was. Though the latest entry in the franchise isn’t a deal breaker it certainly reminds us how special a filmmaker is able to explore the unknowns while terrifying its audience in the process.

Rating: 6.5/10

thumbsup

What do you guys think of ‘Alien: Covenant‘? Do you plan on watching the movie? How would you rank the films in the franchise? And would you rather have gotten a Prometheus sequel or an Alien sequel? Comment below and share your thoughts.

Advertisements

Power Rangers (2017) Review

Published by: Anthony Wallace


Power_Rangers_(2017_Official_Theatrical_Poster)The fate of planet earth is at stake when the evil Rita Repulsa is resurrected from the ocean depths. When five teenagers of attitude are chosen to save earth, they form to become the power rangers. With superhuman strength and a leader behind Zordon the rangers set to face Rita and battle her closest ally in Goldar. Can the rangers save their city of Angel Grove before its too late? Stay tuned to found out.

A sensation of the 90’s swept the globe as Saban’s Power Rangers took kids and future generations by storm. It was a time like nothing else and would live on with countless variations of the hit series. But nothing could compare to the original power rangers and the influence it had on television. Come 1995 we’d see ‘Power Rangers: The Movie‘ come to life with great success. Twenty-two years have passed and now Saban, with the help of Lionsgate, return to deliver a new and revamped property with a more modern take.

636044772319264563-pr-d051-10705-6-r12

Gone are the cheesy action and dialog that has not aged well over time. Even in the earliest stages of the 90’s with the mixture of martial arts and cut-in scenes of the original Japanese series plagued creative for some time. It wasn’t until Rita was recast and new footage was filmed that helped take the series to a whole new level. In the coming seasons we’d get a taste of the powerful mastermind Lord Zedd or King Mondo of the Machine Empire. Thereafter would become history with action figures, VHS tapes, cereals, video games, and even a gateway to Saban spin-offs that weren’t as successful but will always be remembered.

images-2

This time around we get a more dark and serious toned movie that takes what made the original series so great with charismatic actors and incorporating an origins story with it. How I’d describe this movie is that it’s more of a redo of the first episode ‘A Day in the Dumpster‘ with different circumstances and origins tale for both Zordon and Rita. And the main villain being Goldar who’s one of her main henchman’s. There’s even a reference to the Zeo crystals that in some cases looks to bring the reboot a culmination of major events from the early years.

Elizabeth-Banks-as-villain-Rita-Repulsa-on-the-new-Power-Rangers-set

From a technical and production standpoint I thoroughly enjoyed the costume designs of the new rangers and even the location of the Command Center. There was early criticism of the Alpha robot but to me it wasn’t a problem as his personality matched well with his design, even if it’s far different from the original incarnation. There had to be more of an alien feel and look to the suits, Zordon, and Alpha to match the origins of where the rangers came from. Looking back at the series there was a big displacement between the enemies attacking earth and what the suits and everything else seeming more earth like.

If we’re looking at a rebooted franchise with sequels in the works I’d say they’re headed in the right direction. I like the fact that the movie took chances and incorporated current trends and cultural relevancies that brings a breathe of fresh air. RJ Cyler, who plays the blue ranger, breaks from what the original series had with Walter Jones playing the black ranger. A lot of attention was put on it at the time when it was then revealed that it was just a coincidence. But nonetheless RJ Cyler brings a combination of the blue and black ranger from years past and does it phenomenally and was a standout.

There’s even a reveal by the yellow ranger, Trini, played by Becky G., being part of the LBGT community. Some may say Hollywood is going overboard by including more and more LBGT characters into their films to aide a cause but to me it represents a cultural shift, and that is a good thing. The scene in which the reveal occurs is quick, effective and welcoming. Without causing a stir, I say all this because it reflects diversity and a step forward for future generations.

NE1rhzLifuaH44_1_b

Some of the disappointments I have with ‘Power Rangers‘ has to do with the handling of Rita (Elizabeth Banks) and the poor effects that were done for Goldar. Starting with Rita, I thought she started strong but then was handled in a clunky manner towards the end. There’s one scene, that for anyone who’s watched the film will agree, that had me scratching my head. And for Goldar they could’ve done a better job in the special effects department. One may argue the original costume looks better in comparison for what we got. For a second I thought they used stock footage from ‘Gods of Egypt‘ and how awful the effects were for that. One last thing to mention, there’s a moment when the iconic power rangers music comes on and feels displaced compared to the tone of the film; seeming to appease the diehard fans. Personally, they didn’t need to do that.

Believe it or not I’m curious to see where Saban and Lionsgate take this property next as they’ve put their best foot forward. It’ll be interesting to see which villains are thrown in next and seeing as how the studio may be taking a different approach from the television series. Could we be seeing Lord Zedd in the sequel? Time will tell and fans young and old should enjoy ‘Power Rangers‘ for its vision and charismatic actors. It’s morphin time!!

Rating: 6.8/10

thumbsup

What do you guys think? Are you a fan of the ‘Power Rangers‘? Which era are you a fan of and do you look forward to the reboot? Comment below and share your thoughts?

Life (2017) Review

Published by: Anthony Wallace


MV5BMzAwMmQxNTctYjVmYi00MDdlLWEzMWUtOTE5NTRiNDhhNjI2L2ltYWdlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTkxNjUyNQ@@._V1_UX182_CR0,0,182,268_AL_When an international space station intercepts a failed satellite, they discover a single cell membrane that may lead to Earth’s first contact with alien life. As the life form retaliates it looks to attack the astronauts onboard. To the astronauts the only thing that matters is that it doesn’t get back to earth; even if it means taking their own lives. The film is directed by Daniel Espinosa and stars Jake Gyllenhaal, Ryan Reynolds, and Rebecca Ferguson.

First thing that comes to mind when I first saw a preview for ‘Life‘ was how familiar it was. And it’s coincidental that this movie comes out two month before one of the most eagerly hyped films of the year in ‘Alien: Covenant‘. If you thought going into the movie you were going to see something fresh and unused compared to years past then you are terribly mistaken. But what the movie does have going for it are the involvement of its stars. And believe it or not the acting isn’t all that bad. As a matter of fact, the movie is competent for most of its duration. Yet in the end the movie is just there.

life-2017-scifi-movie-trailer

Getting this out of the way, the movie does give call-backs to Alien and many other franchises; almost to the extent of embarrassment. One of which is shown in the trailer where Ariyon Bakare’s character is seen having hand difficulty when the organism grabs hold. It immediately brought me back to Ridley Scott’sPrometheus‘ (2012) when a biologist gets his arm snapped by an alien worm. And once the organism grows to a certain point it resembles something we’d see in ‘The Faculty‘ where high schoolers fend off against parasites taking hold of there teachers.

images

Looking back I regret even seeing the trailer because beat by beat you see major spoilers that lessens the events that transpire. And upsettingly the conclusion is spoiled with a lackluster twist. What I hoped to get from the movie was some form of character development to where we can care about the people we watch. To a point they succeed with one of the astronauts who’s welcoming a baby girl. And another who’s length of time in space is taking a physical toll on his body but emotionally he is not too ready to return to earth because of space’s tranquility. Yet as a whole the script doesn’t succeed in making us care for them when turmoil ensues.

Though the movie started with promise and exposition as to what life-form they’re dealing with, I was hoping they’d go into more detail. The movie just rushes to move ahead rather then venture into what the organism is capable of or what its endgame would be. It’s obvious that it can’t get to earth because doing so would put the fate of mankind at risk. So where’s the suspense? There really isn’t any. From Gyllenhaal to Reynolds to Ferguson, they all were fine with some gripes to be made on some of their decision making. It’s not a terrible movie. It’s not a game-changer. ‘Life‘ is sadly just there.

Rating: 6.5/10

thumbsup

How do you feel about ‘Life‘? Are you planning on watching it? How does it compare to other sci-fi movies in years past? Comment below and share your thoughts.

Logan (2017) Review

Published by: Anthony Wallace


mv5bmji1mjkzmjczmv5bml5banbnxkftztgwndk4njyymti-_v1_ux182_cr00182268_al_It may be the curtain call for Hugh Jackman as he steps into the shoes of Wolverine but he leaves a lasting impression. What is probably the most character driven installment in Twentieth Century Fox’s X-Men series, Director James Mangold puts heart and soul into what has to be considered every fan’s dream. As Logan’s health deteriorates he discovers that he has a daughter, Laura, who is fleeing from danger and discovers a safe haven that is located in North Dakota. Their journey is met with obstacles and may push Wolverine to the brink. The film also sees Patrick Stewart, Dafne Keen, Boyd Holbrook, and Stephen Merchant.

The anticipation for an R-rated Wolverine movie has been brewing for years amongst the fan base. And that’s exactly what the studio delivers in what may very well be the last time we see Hugh Jackman don the claws. Being someone who doesn’t follow the series, it not only satisfied me as a comic book movie but it stood tall as a proper send off to an iconic Marvel character. It could even be said that ‘Logan‘ was the least comic-book to film adaptation because of its themes and tone. As exciting as it was to watch Wolverine splice and dice his victims we get a better insight into the emotional strings that have made him so bitter for so long. And the reveal of his daughter Laura helped to bring that compassionate side of him out; though it took a pretty good while before Logan to come around. logan-2017-trailer-sees-hugh-jack-playing-the-most-emotional-wolverine-he-has-ever-been-in-any-x-men-movie-youtube-movieclips-trailers_931699

We get good performances all around as we start off by mentioning Hugh Jackman. He will always be Wolverine to the eyes of the fans and nobody, as far as the eye can see, can replace him. Patrick Stewart reprises his role as Professor X (aka Charles Xavier) as we see him falling to the bits. In many ways we can see both characters reaching their end to a degree. There were many heartfelt moments between them as their relationship had really built over time. Then we see Dafne Keen who is the daughter of Logan. Their relationship took a while to develop but when the time came it would hit home. The chemistry between Jackman and Keen managed to work out and had plenty of surprises to go with it.

logan-2017-wallpapers-free-download

Obviously the action was what everyone wanted to see and a more brutal and bloody one at that. From the opening action sequence to the very end, let’s just say that heads were rolling. And a mentioning has to go out to Dafne Keen who surpassed my expectations and then some because of how easy she made it look. And that’s what elevated the fun element and depending on where Twentieth Century Fox decides to go hopefully we’ll get to see her again. There were twists and turns along the way that caught me by surprise and that I didn’t see coming. In many ways the film centered around closing story arcs and is the overall interpretation that’s given for some of the characters.

Where Fox decides to take the X-Men series next with or without Hugh Jackman as Wolverine remains to be seen. It’s going to be an adjustment for not only the studio but especially the fans. There are seeds of development that could spill into the next movie but to avoid spoilers they will not be mentioned. A lot of attention and effort was put into ‘Logan‘ and everyone should leave satisfied as probably the best performance by Hugh Jackman in the series. If it truly is the end for Wolverine as we know him in this incarnation then kudos to an amazing journey.

Rating: 7.8/10

thumbsup

What do you guys think? Do you plan on watching ‘Logan‘? And is this really the last performance by Hugh Jackman as Wolverine? Comment below and share your thoughts.

Get Out (2017) Review

Published by: Anthony Wallace


get-out-2017-2In an age of reciprocal storytelling and an audience that clamors for something new there sometimes comes a breakthrough. The writer and directorial debut of Jordan Peele presents a fresh concept with a thrilling take on social commentary. Not only is ‘Get Out‘ a thriller but it also has a mix of comedy and a great ensemble cast. The film stars Daniel Kaluuya, Allison Williams, and LilRel Howery. As the story goes, Chris is about to meet the parents of his new girlfriend, Rose. What starts as a warm welcome then turns to bizarre events as Chris realizes he may be caught in a sinister plot.

We’ve been fortunate to have seen some great work from new and upcoming directors from these last couple of years. And this is no different as Jordan Peele takes risk in using social commentary of interracial relationships and injecting a bit of horror. After watching ‘Get Out‘ the one thing I appreciated most was how simple the concept was and didn’t overcomplicate itself. Many times movies can bombard itself with plot twists and then lose focus as to what made the movie effective in the first place. Credit also has to be given to the cast because they didn’t over do themselves nor did they fall victim as movies tend to do.

maxresdefault2

I’m not going to go into detail as to what happens in the movie because everyone should go in with a fresh set of eyes. All I will say is that there was a great use of suspense that managed to carry all the way through the film. Not once are you looking at your watch and asking yourself if the movie is over. And again, the movie runs with great pace that allows the audience to stay on their toes. Daniel Kaluuya, who plays Chris, on many occasions was paranoid considering he was black and if you put yourself in his shoes you would be just as freaked out. That’s what made the movie unique and many people from all walks of life could connect with his character.

This was a great film and one that took me by surprise. Jordan Peele is on the right track and has a bright future in his film career. Could we see another project down the line that mirrors a similar plot? It’s too early to tell but I hope we get more of these because original features seems too much to ask now-a-days.

Rating: 8/10

thumbsup

What do you guys think of ‘Get Out‘? Do you plan on watching the movie? Comment below and share your thoughts.

A Cure for Wellness (2017) Review

Published by: Anthony Wallace


cureforwellnessposterComing from the director who brought us ‘The Ring‘ and the first three films in the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise, Gore Verbinski returns to direct a psychological thriller in ‘A Cure for Wellness‘. The film stars Dane DeHaan, Jason Isaacs, and Mia Goth as the movie centers around a representative of a company, Mr. Lockhart, who is sent to retrieve a fellow colleague, Mr. Pembroke, who is staying at an institution due to health reasons. However, once he arrives and discovers that the institution is keeping their motives and methods of operation in the dark, Lockhart scrambles for answers before he himself gets stuck there forever.

The trailer got me interested in seeing the movie mainly because Dane DeHaan was in it and the startling imagery that gave me the impression that the story was going to be good. Gore Verbinski is a great director and can find ways in getting under the audience’s skin. This is why his latest film, although had some decent performances out of DeHaan and Isaacs and some creepy visual effects, struggled from a narrative point of view and wasn’t always in focus.

cureforwellness0006

One of the things this movie reminded me of was of ‘Shutter Island‘ (2010) and how Dehaan’s character, Lockhart, is sent to a location that’s isolated and gets caught up in a scheme. Of course, the main characters of each film had different motivations but they did share similar character traits. And just as we saw in ‘Shutter Island‘, there is a girl involved but only this time she is an innocent who unbenounced to her is in danger. So given there were similarities between the two movies I did enjoy some aspects nonetheless by Verbinski.

This is a visually appealing film to watch and I thoroughly enjoyed a scene that shows Lockhart arriving to the institution by car. Just that scene alone and the locations in which the movie was filmed took my breathe away. From an aesthetic point of view everything looked amazing. We then get into the performances by Dehaan and Isaacs who individually held their own up until the very end which is where there were problems in the narrative that needed to be addressed.

a-cure-for-wellness

When watching the film it really took its time building the narrative and for subsequent events to occur. Sometimes the movie dragged on a little bit too much and there were times when I wondered when something would happen. A lot of the suspense scenes you see in the trailer is unfortunately given away and thus makes the movie feel even more of a drag. As we approach the climax of the movie and after all the talk about the townspeople and how there’s been fear of the institution it leads up to a big ball of confusion. And that’s where the narrative failed to weave the needle in a coherent way that eventually fails in its own mess.

It’s not to say the movie is terrible because Dane DeHaan was great along with Jason Isaacs. And as mentioned earlier the locations in which the film was made are stunning to look at. However, with the narrative mess and inconsistencies throughout I just couldn’t appreciate it as much as I could have. I’d say this not as good as ‘Shutter Island‘ nor does it succeed as a whole from an entertainment point of view. Go into ‘A Cure for Wellness‘ with low expectations and just enjoy the visual appeal that it presents.

Rating: 5.5/10

13476359851958638477thumbs-down-icon-red-hi-md

What do you guys think of ‘A Cure for Wellness‘? Are you planning on seeing it? Comment below and share your thoughts.

The LEGO Batman Movie (2017) Review

Published by: Anthony Wallace


mv5bmtcynteyoty0m15bml5banbnxkftztgwotaynzu3mdi-_v1_ux182_cr00182268_al_One of the most renowned comic book characters in the DC cinematic universe is brought to life in Lego form. Directed by Chris McKay and taken from the highly acclaimed ‘The LEGO Movie‘ (2014) with its own spin-off by Warner Bros. sees the caped crusader in the tiniest of ways. In what is a tribute to one of the most universal superheroes in all of comics is a movie made with love and understanding of the Batman character. The film sees the voice-over work played by Will Arnett as Batman/Bruce Wayne, Michael Cera as Robin/Dick Grayson, Rosario Dawson as Batgirl/Barbara Gordon, and Zack Galifianakis as The Joker.

After seeing ‘The LEGO Movie‘ there was a fast response by the studio to announce a spin-off for the LEGO Batman movie. The character of Batman is so iconic and in many ways stole the show in Warner Bros. success with the LEGO property that it was a no brainer that the studio would give fans something they would want to see. And having seen the film I have got to say that not only do the writers and director nail the character but we get to see homage to the character that has spanned television, comic, and cinemas for nearly 75 years. We also get references to many of the villains from years past but all the while staying true to Batman’s truly dark and testy villain of all, The Joker.

maxresdefault

As for the premise, Gotham City is about to usher in a new Commissioner in Barbara Gordon who wants to do away with the masked Vigilante. All the while Batman receives notice that he is now the caretaker of Dick Grayson and has to face his fears of accepting people into his life that over the years has kept him in darkness. And with the sudden emergence of The Joker’s plan to destroy Gotham using the help of the Phantom Zone, Batman must work with his allies and enemies in stopping the city from being destroyed.

legobatman0011

There’s a lot to take away from this movie and is not only for kids to enjoy but for parents as well. If you’re a fan of Batman you’ll not only enjoy the movie but also receive life lessons as Bruce Wayne tries to mend the wounds that have plagued him from not allowing people into his life. From the opening credits you get a hilarious monologue by Batman that pokes fun in and of itself. From references to the Justice League and even the most divisive movie of 2016 in ‘Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice‘, Warner Bros. is not afraid to own up to their missteps. We even get a glimpse into the possibility of seeing Superman or even the Justice League getting their own spin-offs somewhere down the line.

Warner Bros. and those behind the LEGO property are doing great things with the DC universe. From the graphics and storytelling elements there is a tremendous amount of care being put into these properties that in many ways outshines the live action takes we’ve seen with ‘Batman v. Superman‘ and ‘Suicide Squad‘. But as far as ‘The LEGO Batman Movie‘, Chris McKay delivers and everyone who goes out to watch the film will not only be impressed but may even be moved in ways you didn’t expect to be.

Rating: 7.5/10

thumbsup

What do you think of ‘The LEGO Batman Movie‘? Do you plan on watching it? And do you think WB is having more success with the LEGO films compared to live action? Comment below and share your thoughts.