Category Archives: Reviews

Annabelle: Creation (2017) Review

Published by: Anthony Wallace


downloadIt’s the prequel to the spin-off that left a sour taste in fan’s mouths when ‘Annabelle‘ released in late 2014. As ‘The Conjuring‘ took the horror genre by storm it was also the start of what would become a world building franchise. The Annabelle doll story was so famously remembered that Warner Bros. ran with the hype and began the project not so long after ‘The Conjuring’ release. Its release was met with lukewarm reactions by fans and critics that it felt more like a cash grab than a full on attempt in making a truly terrifying experience. Which leads us now to ‘Annabelle: Creation‘ and bringing the story full circle.

When Samuel and Esther Mullins lose their daughter in a tragic accident, years later they welcome a nun and foster children to live in their home. But when one of the children, Linda, discovers a doll in a locked room she unwittingly releases an unspeakable evil. As the family begins to take notice of the changes in Linda’s behavior they must gather together to save her soul.

annabelle-creation-trailer

The interest in another Annabelle film was not something I anticipated or expected seeing as how the last one had ended. Yet the studio had other plans and sought out the director of David F. Sandberg’s  with ‘Lights Out‘. A first time success built confidence in not only the director but in producer James Wan as well. Their collaboration together could make for great cinema. And after watching ‘Annabelle: Creation‘ it can easily be said that the film has put fear back into the cinematic audience.

ac-fp-080r-600x400

What starts as a bright movie about a loving family is suddenly transformed into a moment of tragedy. The tone of the movie easily shifts from moment to moment with ease which eventually leads to nothing but terror by the end. Young actress, Talitha Bateman, plays a paraplegic orphan who goes to forbidden places and the rest is history. One thing that the Conjuring series has done right is by focusing on young talent and their vulnerability to evil. Speaking of which, we should mention a supporting role in Lulu Wilson who plays the friend of Janice. Wilson played the lead in ‘Ouija: Origin of Evil‘ (2016) as a young girl who gets possessed by a demonic spirit after playing with a ouija board. She’s an easy fit for a franchise that has benefited by young actors.

David Sandberg did an amazing job in building suspense with a creepy house and a menacing doll. What benefited Sandberg and what was lacking in the original ‘Annabelle‘ was the proper build up of fear. The use of lights and shadows played effectively here with moments of hair raising fright. Even though the setup may be familiar it certainly was more entertaining to watch. If audiences play close enough attention they’ll also get an easter egg for a cinematic building universe.

_T2A7437.dng

Though the film does a better job at telling a story it does suffer from a lack of major character development. It was even more surprising when a certain character departs after revealing something of importance to one of the children. The movie basically tries to shift between the children characters that we can never get close to any of them. Ultimately it’s the doll that wins and this time it has the proper screen time to prove it. As we get to the ending it makes the connection to the first film. My only gripe would be that the events that precedes this film is a reminder of how much it let me down in the first place.

With that said, ‘Annabelle: Creation‘ is a vast improvement in story-telling with compelling characters and a little something called passion. David Sandberg has succeeded again with the help of James Wan in his corner. Fans of the Conjuring series will rejoice and can only look forward to what the franchise will bring next. If James Wan were to move on from the franchise we can be rest-assured that it will be in good hands with the likes of an up and coming director.

Rating: 7/10

thumbsup

What do you guys think? Are you planning on watching ‘Annabelle: Creation‘? Is Annabelle a compelling character that needs to be further explored? Comment below and share your thoughts.

Advertisements

Saw III (2006) Review

Saw3_cape10It must be Halloween and by now the season has bowed to Lionsgate’s horror sensation with the Saw franchise. Director Darren Lynn Bousman returns with the sequel which sees Tobin Bell, Shawnee Smith, and a whole slew of new victims lined up to play a game. The studio at this point had made a home in the month of October right before Halloween and with much success.

Jigsaw and Amanda have disappeared while detectives continue to investigate the murders. A new game is thrust into motion as Jigsaw prepares for what could very well be his last days on earth. Lynn Denlon is chosen to keep John Kramer alive long enough while another test subject makes his way through a series of tests. It leads to a revelation in the finale that may set up deadly results.

We’ve arrived to one of my favorite Saw films up till this point and a lot can be said about this entry. Let’s begin by saying that this is perhaps the most depth we’ll get from Jigsaw as his cancer has taken a toll on him. Actor Tobin Bell even made it clear to the writers that the idea of his character being in the process of dying due to pancreatic cancer was not something that was easy to accept. And now we’ve reached the point where an anti-hero is on the cusp of breathing his last breath. I loosely use the term anti-hero because of John Kramer’s reputation as someone who goes after the people who have wronged.

images

There’s two story plots we follow as one of them involves Dr. Lynn Denlon and the other story line that follows Jeff (Angus Macfadyen). The two characters who are being tested by Jigsaw are probably the most in which general audiences can connect with. Both will have a connection towards the end of the film but it can be predicted early on. What this movie tries to delve into is the idea of loss and how people grieve in the process. Jeff has just lost his son due to an accident while his son rode a bike until a car hit him from out of nowhere. Revenge has been on Jeff’s mind and has been wanting to confront the man responsible for his son’s death. His family had been turned upside down as it had also affected his young daughter. Just from how the movie sets this up anyone can connect to his character.

images

Let’s now talk about the traps because this time around the traps are more focused on forgiveness. As Jeff goes room to room confronting those who had any involvement in his son’s case were subject to a test. From the lone witness to the judge handling the case to then finally confronting the man responsible for his son’s death, Jeff must find it inside to let his anger take over him or try to heal the wounds that have hurt his family. It’s not until the end of the movie that we discover if Jeff has been rehabilitated through his journey of pain. What can be said though is that each trap is unsettling and leaves the blood in Jeff’s hands.

As mentioned before Shawnee Smith returns in the sequel as Jigsaw’s apprentice as it was revealed at the end of ‘Saw II‘. What we learn from Jigsaw is that Amanda has troubles that stretch greater than just a drug problem. Her trouble of keeping her emotions in check has resulted in several deaths; some of which were survivors. One of the big twists we discover is that Jigsaw was testing Amanda and not Lynn Denlon as was first thought. Ultimately, the decision Amanda makes in whether to keep Lynn alive or to do away with her will have huge ramifications for everyone; including John Kramer. The chemistry between Tobin and Shawnee is amazing. As the series reaches this point we learn more about Amanda and in some ways feel bad for her. In some ways she is a lost soul battling to see John’s ways.

troyhd1

Both Angus Macfadyen and Bahar Soomekh did a great job as their characters were taken through an emotional hell. In many ways it’s rare to find characters that we root for. Although it’s a Saw film and there’s expectations that usually leads to death it was nice to see a change in the formula compared to the previous films. Then when we talk about Jigsaw it’s almost difficult to say if he’s a bad guy or a vigilante who does what society is afraid of doing. This adds another element of intrigue to an already crazy series.

Throughout the movie we get seeds planted for if and when another Saw film is made. Inevitably a sequel is greenlit but the question that’s asked is how does a franchise continue when the lead character has met his fate? An interesting fact is that ‘Saw III‘ went on to become the most successful horror sequel and was entered into the Guinness Book of World Records. This movie would go on to be the longest film in the franchise by coming in just under two hours. Stemming from the success the fans were clamoring for more, or should we say the studio wanted more?  The studio would push forward with another film in 2007 and would take the franchise into uncharted territory.

Rating: 6.5/10

thumbsup

What do you guys think of ‘Saw III’? Did you watch the movie in theaters? And up till this point which were some of your favorite traps? Comment below and share your thoughts.

Saw II (2005) Review

MV5BOTRjMDNmNjctNjg4ZC00N2ZkLThkMzMtOWRmYTFhMzA1ZDZlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTIzOTk5ODM@._V1_UX182_CR0,0,182,268_AL_Jigsaw is back and this time a new game is being played in the sequel to its predecessor. As Detective Matthews discovers the body of a close friend/informant he is thrust into a game of survival. And this time his patience is tested as his son, Daniel, is trapped. Can Eric Matthews find his son in time before it’s too late? Or does Jigsaw have something up his sleeve that turns the game upside down?

The director this time around and who would go on to direct the next two sequels is Darren Lynn Bousman. Being a first time director may not have been the only challenge going into ‘Saw II‘, but moreso asking how do we follow-up to such a smart and visceral original idea. Focus this time around was putting the villain out there on center stage. Actor Tobin Bell returns to play John Kramer (a.k.a Jigsaw) who now has the opportunity to show who he really is about versus lying on the floor for an entire first film.

download

 

What I really enjoyed about ‘Saw II‘ was not only how we’re watching the chaos unfold but rather seeing through the eyes of Jigsaw himself. Instead of Jigsaw being this escapable superhuman character we get a deep and telling account of a terminally ill individual whose agenda is to help heal the wounds of the lost through unorthodox methods. Taking into account the things we take for granted in life and those who we hurt in the process all plays into how John Kramer spends his limited time left before his eventual demise.

download (1)

This time around our main player in the game is Donnie Wahlberg as Detective Eric Matthews and his involvement in the police force. His relationship with his son Daniel is shaken to its core and Jigsaw takes note of it. By capturing his son, Eric must play a game with John Kramer in order to see his son again. The game itself is centered around Eric’s weakness and his unwillingness to listen. With time ticking away you watch Eric Matthews get more and more desperate and thus falls into his old habits that has got him into this situation in the first place. Very few movies had the courage to bring the villain out into the open. Give credit where credit is due  however as Darren Lynn Bousman steered the carnage and suspense through the lens.

2

There are two separate events happening at the same time and we shift between the two story arcs in intricate fashion. One in the which we’ve already spoken about in Jigsaw and Eric Matthews but the other is centered around eight individuals who awaken in a room where they have limited time to locate serums before a deadly toxin poisons them. Included in the group is Daniel Matthews, son of Eric, as he becomes the link to everyone in the group as to why they’ve assembled there. The group dynamic is interesting because everyone is in the same situation yet everyone seems to turn on each other.

8c5eee1e-4fe6-11e4-a019-005056b70bb8

Now it’s time to discuss the traps in the film because after the original movie audiences remembered the inventiveness of some of the obstacles characters found themselves in. This time around the traps are more intricate yet relatively simple as compared to the reverse bear trap as seen with Shawnee Smith who played Amanda. Probably the most memorable trap that made everyone squirmish was the needle pit. When Amanda was thrown in against her will and fell onto the needles it just brought a reaction by audiences that would terrify them if they ever saw a needle again. Other mentionable traps included a furnace where only the devil could help you out and a box in which a certain person puts their arms through it leads to a miserable time.

The sequel not only solidifies the traps in the franchise but also the twists as well. In ‘Saw II’ we get a twist that not only sets up for the sequel but also gives a revelation on what Jigsaw’s master plan is. Not only is the sequel a great one but it sets the mark that Saw is a legitimate franchise with a memorable character in Jigsaw who has more story to tell. Tobin Bell plays a character  who is eerie yet resonates with audiences as it relates to how society treats the terminally ill. Composed as a fictional character he resonates on many levels as future installments will explore. If you thought the sequel was terrifying just wait till we talk about ‘Saw III’ as it will open the world of Jigsaw to a whole other level.

Rating: 7/10

thumbsup

What do you guys think of ‘Saw II‘? How does it compare to the original and was this the jumping point for the Jigsaw character? Comment below and share your thoughts.

Saw (2004) Review

Published by: Anthony Wallace


MV5BMjE4MDYzNDE1OV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDY2OTYwNA@@._V1_UX182_CR0,0,182,268_AL_From the creator who has brought us the Conjuring and Insidious franchises began his career with a little gem that put Lionsgate on the map. Both James Wan and Leigh Whannell came together in introducing a new thriller that involves a killer who puts his victims in unimaginable situations of life and death. The difference this time around is that the victims are guilty of taking life for granted and are put in traps that revolve around their own personal sins. Not your usual psycho killer scenario but near the philosophical prowess of Anthony Hopkin’s Hannibal Lecter. So let’s jump right into it and delve into the film that started it all.

Two men awaken in a dilapidated bathroom unknowing of how they got there. With little time they must work together to figure out who put them there and why. When we learn of a serial killer named Jigsaw through the viewpoint of Dr. Gordon both men begin to realize why they are there and that escape may be more complicated than they thought. And in a stunning series of events everything builds up to a shocking finale.

MV5BMTA3NzExOTYxOTFeQTJeQWpwZ15BbWU3MDc1Njk2MDQ@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,1512,1000_AL_

What many people may not know is that the film was made on a $1 million budget and everything was filmed in one location. And with such a budget we were able to get Danny Glover and Cary Elwes. The big mystery that would eventually reveal itself at the end is the emergence of Tobin Bell as Jigsaw himself. Jigsaw himself wasn’t given away through exposition but instead it fools the audience into thinking who’s pulling the strings the whole time. Even the ending has a gratifying result because soon as we discover the perpetrator it leaves the viewer wanting to see more. It also worked to a point that if the studio decided to not move forward with a sequel it would leave a mark in cinematic history.

There were two memorable scenes in the film and one of them would go on to be iconic in the entire series. The scene involves Amanda, played by Shawnee Smith, as she awakens with a reverse bear trap on her head. She must retrieve the key from her supposedly dead cell mate before the timer goes off. Simplicity is what made the film original and frightening especially when it comes to the traps. As the series progresses the traps get overly complicated but the reverse bear trap remains one of the most terrifying sequences and became the staple in the franchise.

saw2

We may not have gotten a lot of background into Jigsaw but Tobin Bell would be revealed to be Hollywood’s next horror icon. Though little is known about his character we begin to discover the psyche in how Jigsaw works. And what’s different compared to the likes of ‘Friday the 13th‘ and ‘A Nightmare On Elm Street‘ is that we get a character that has a motivation besides just killing for the sake of killing. Jigsaw finds flaws in his victims and puts them in traps with hopes that their experience will change their perspectives on life. Again, this is not your typical horror thriller where someone goes after people with revenge in mind. Rather in a twisted sort of way it puts everyone in the city on edge.

As far as the acting in the film it is not groundbreaking nor Oscar worthy. There are moments when the lead character, Dr. Gordon, does come off a little over the top. We can’t even judge the performance by the villain because he’s lying on the floor the whole time. The only reasonable performance we see is with Danny Glover who is the detective that’s put on the case as he searches for the suspect behind the murders.

The movie is not perfect as there are far fetched scenarios sprinkled throughout. But the overall reaction to the film when it came out in 2004 was that of praise and raised moviegoer eyebrows. With the success the studio immediately moved forward with greenlighting a sequel that would come out in a year’s time. It was the dawn of a new franchise and would go on to become one of the most successful horror franchises in the Guinness Book of World Records.

Rating: 7/10

thumbsup

What do you guys think of ‘Saw‘? Would you consider the original film to be groundbreaking in the horror franchise? Comment below and share your thoughts.

Wonder Woman (2017) Review

Published by: Anthony Wallace


wwposter5The road for DC has been nothing but a bumpy start to their cinematic universe. With both ‘Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice‘ and ‘Suicide Squad‘ getting mixed to negative reviews things have been looking grim for Warner Bros. The tide may be turning however as Gal Gadot takes on the amazon warrior’s mantle in ‘Wonder Woman‘. In what is considered a must win situation for not only the studio but especially weary fans of the DC universe the trick may be the film’s new director in Patty Jenkins.

A strong and determined warrior in Diana Prince, Princess of Themyscira, befriends a German spy in Steve Trevor. After a confrontation that leaves her home in fear of the outside world, Diana flees with Steve to end the Great War in Germany. It is through belief that Diana fights side by side with the human race in believing there is more good then there is evil.

GalleryMovies_1920x1080_WW-01748c_581be0d043d5a5.54352008

Getting this out of the way, Warner Bros. has created a winner with Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman. What’s filled with action and adventure we get a good look at the character that has been the idol of many women around the world through decades past. The negative reaction first hand when Gadot was cast as the Amazon warrior was later silenced in her cameo appearance in ‘Batman v. Superman‘ alongside Ben Affleck and Henry Cavill. It continues in this film that not only does she prove the naysayers wrong but doing so with heart and determination.

Wonder-Woman-2017-Movie-Wallpaper-06-1024x768

One of the things that stood out to me was how great of a job they were able to flesh out her character. Giving us a glimpse into not only her family heritage but also struggling to make understanding of the outside world with her relationship with Steve Trevor, played by Chris Pine. While we’re mentioning Chris Pine, it’s safe to say he has great chemistry with Gal Gadot and it was without a doubt a plus for the film. It’s unfortunate of the circumstances towards the end of the movie but with that said Pine was a great choice to play alongside Gadot as they fought Ludendorff to the nail.

If we had to make a comparison I would say the writers did a better job in fleshing out Diana Prince as compared to how the writers for ‘Man of Steel‘ did with Clark Kent. With only being one of highlights it demonstrates a much improved script and in how to tell a cohesive narrative. There were even times where I made a comparison to Marvel’s ‘Captain America: The First Avenger‘ as in how they used a World War setting for their respective properties. Just imagine if we were to get a crossover of both characters and how amazing that could be.

wonder_woman_SD2_758_426_81_s_c1

A well put together effort by Director Patty Jenkins puts this DC movie as one of the best films in the cinematic universe. And it also manages to balance tone and action without falling victim to being dreary and dire as in past attempts. It’s almost night and day from where we were last Summer as many were wondering if DC was in turbulent times. Could this mean we can look forward to a much brighter future for the upcoming DC properties and the eventual ‘Justice League‘ film? Let’s not jump the gun just yet but definitely ‘Wonder Woman‘ is a gigantic step in the right direction.

Rating: 7.8/10

thumbsup

What do you guys think? Do you plan on watching ‘Wonder Woman‘? Comment below and share your thoughts about the movie.

Alien: Covenant (2017) Review

Published by: Anthony Wallace


IMG_20170323_0950491It was 38 years ago that movie watchers were introduced to ‘Alien‘ back in 1979. Director Ridley Scott would go on to terrify audiences with a gut wrenching, hair raising cat and mouse game when space truckers encounter a deadly beast in deep space. A first of its kind that would spawn rip-offs that pales in comparison to a horror masterpiece. Then 33 years later, Scott would return to the universe that solidified his career with 2012’s ‘Prometheus‘. His return was met with praise and frustration as the movie had high production value but lacked in answering it’s big questions.

This now leads us to the follow-up in ‘Alien: Covenant‘ where Ridley Scott promises to bring back the Xenomorphs and the carnage fans came to love. And he also provides answers to the many lingering pains that were left unanswered in ‘Prometheus‘. After months and months of anticipation the time has finally arrived where fans look forward to a much needed Alien sequel. What one has to wonder is if fans will be satisfied for what has been a tumultuous journey up to this point.

xEMPIRE_AC_PAGE_73_CROP_1.jpg.pagespeed.ic.bQn51ps3b0

As a colony ship, the Covenant, advances towards its destination of a new home they are hit by a neutrino burst. The crew awakens from cryo-sleep to then intercept a signal from a nearby planet that closely resembles earth. While investigating this new world they discover what turns out to be a deadly game of survival when death and chaos awaits their arrival. The film stars Katherine Waterston, Michael Fassbender, Billy Crudup, and Danny McBride.

I was in the minority of those who enjoyed ‘Prometheus‘ and praised the direction and production that was put into the project. The idea of the Engineers was clever as it brought about the idea of creators of mankind who then turn on their creation. Michael Fassbender’s David makes a strong presence as the newly created android by the Weyland Corporation as his ability to be curious takes on a life of its own. Going into ‘Alien: Covenant‘ I was looking forward to another strong performance by Michael Fassbender as this time around he plays not only David but the Covenant’s new android Walter.v1.bjsxNTM1OTU4O2o7MTczNDI7MTIwMDs0NjYyOzMxMzk

The way to describe ‘Alien: Covenant‘ is a little frustrating because as much as it tries to be an Alien movie it also tries being a sequel to ‘Prometheus‘. And a lot of it has to do with Ridley Scott trying to appease the fan bases in both camps. Starting with the positives the movie is beautiful to look at. If there’s one thing everyone can agree on is that Ridley Scott knows how to produce and direct. From the external shots of the Covenant ship to the landscapes of the Engineer’s home world they are breathtaking to watch. Even the cast do a decent job while falling one by one to deadly pathogens.

Lead actress Katherine Waterston plays the distressed co-captain alongside Billy Crudup’s Oram. The director’s belief in casting strong females for the role has proven to be true as was the case of Sigourney Weaver. Except she isn’t meant to surpass Weaver’s performance in the franchise rather to demonstrate the tenacity as she fights for her life. Unfortunately, a large chunk of the runtime is dedicated to Michael Fassbender’s David/Walter as he continues to explore the idea of creation. But that’s what saves the film from floundering into familiar gasps and terror. David takes things to the next level and that’s when he truly becomes a terrifying menace.

Unknown

Now we come to the difficult part because as much as we’re entertained by Michael Fassbender and the visual prowess of Ridley Scott, the film struggles to balance in tone. When we explore the terrain of an uncharted paradise it’s hard not to forget ‘Prometheus‘ and the scientific expedition that took place as they journey to find humanity’s origins. Then there comes a point when the monsters arrive, a.k.a the back-burster, and the many other creatures that show up in the film. The creatures almost seemed to take the backseat or were merely around to make an appearance. A good chunk of the film glides around the questions of the Engineers and how David survives a hostile environment. There never were smooth transitions between the terror and the grand ideas set by the script. It’s unfortunate because the lack of substance behind the Engineers is something I was hoping to see more of.

ac_050_00194666_novyy-razmer

There’s going to be disappointment and that’s because the script tries to please everyone but not in a satisfying way that we’d hope. Great performances by the cast; more specifically Michael Fassbender and even the one and only Danny McBride. There are terrifying moments in the movie and I wouldn’t even say its the aliens themselves. If you were put off by the religious and scientific garble in ‘Prometheus‘ then don’t expect it to go away. In fact, it may be more blatant as the movie does explore the ideas of heaven and hell. If you’re a fan of the aliens then you will also be disappointed because their mysterious beginnings may spoil the lore that fans have enjoyed for many years.

images

It may take subsequent viewings to change my perspective on ‘Alien: Covenant‘ as time goes on. But in the way I was thoroughly in awe of ‘Prometheus‘ on its first viewing it may be a tough mountain to climb. This is not an easy review because although I tried not to go in with expectations I still ended up feeling somewhat let down. The last thing I will mention is the sound score by Jed Kurzel. He did a great job by mixing in the sound of Jerry Goldsmith’sAlien‘ with this movie. There was a great use of buildup when things started going awry. It made me feel like we returned to Ridley Scott’s world and bringing back memories of how great the original ‘Alien‘ was. Though the latest entry in the franchise isn’t a deal breaker it certainly reminds us how special a filmmaker is able to explore the unknowns while terrifying its audience in the process.

Rating: 6.5/10

thumbsup

What do you guys think of ‘Alien: Covenant‘? Do you plan on watching the movie? How would you rank the films in the franchise? And would you rather have gotten a Prometheus sequel or an Alien sequel? Comment below and share your thoughts.

Power Rangers (2017) Review

Published by: Anthony Wallace


Power_Rangers_(2017_Official_Theatrical_Poster)The fate of planet earth is at stake when the evil Rita Repulsa is resurrected from the ocean depths. When five teenagers of attitude are chosen to save earth, they form to become the power rangers. With superhuman strength and a leader behind Zordon the rangers set to face Rita and battle her closest ally in Goldar. Can the rangers save their city of Angel Grove before its too late? Stay tuned to found out.

A sensation of the 90’s swept the globe as Saban’s Power Rangers took kids and future generations by storm. It was a time like nothing else and would live on with countless variations of the hit series. But nothing could compare to the original power rangers and the influence it had on television. Come 1995 we’d see ‘Power Rangers: The Movie‘ come to life with great success. Twenty-two years have passed and now Saban, with the help of Lionsgate, return to deliver a new and revamped property with a more modern take.

636044772319264563-pr-d051-10705-6-r12

Gone are the cheesy action and dialog that has not aged well over time. Even in the earliest stages of the 90’s with the mixture of martial arts and cut-in scenes of the original Japanese series plagued creative for some time. It wasn’t until Rita was recast and new footage was filmed that helped take the series to a whole new level. In the coming seasons we’d get a taste of the powerful mastermind Lord Zedd or King Mondo of the Machine Empire. Thereafter would become history with action figures, VHS tapes, cereals, video games, and even a gateway to Saban spin-offs that weren’t as successful but will always be remembered.

images-2

This time around we get a more dark and serious toned movie that takes what made the original series so great with charismatic actors and incorporating an origins story with it. How I’d describe this movie is that it’s more of a redo of the first episode ‘A Day in the Dumpster‘ with different circumstances and origins tale for both Zordon and Rita. And the main villain being Goldar who’s one of her main henchman’s. There’s even a reference to the Zeo crystals that in some cases looks to bring the reboot a culmination of major events from the early years.

Elizabeth-Banks-as-villain-Rita-Repulsa-on-the-new-Power-Rangers-set

From a technical and production standpoint I thoroughly enjoyed the costume designs of the new rangers and even the location of the Command Center. There was early criticism of the Alpha robot but to me it wasn’t a problem as his personality matched well with his design, even if it’s far different from the original incarnation. There had to be more of an alien feel and look to the suits, Zordon, and Alpha to match the origins of where the rangers came from. Looking back at the series there was a big displacement between the enemies attacking earth and what the suits and everything else seeming more earth like.

If we’re looking at a rebooted franchise with sequels in the works I’d say they’re headed in the right direction. I like the fact that the movie took chances and incorporated current trends and cultural relevancies that brings a breathe of fresh air. RJ Cyler, who plays the blue ranger, breaks from what the original series had with Walter Jones playing the black ranger. A lot of attention was put on it at the time when it was then revealed that it was just a coincidence. But nonetheless RJ Cyler brings a combination of the blue and black ranger from years past and does it phenomenally and was a standout.

There’s even a reveal by the yellow ranger, Trini, played by Becky G., being part of the LBGT community. Some may say Hollywood is going overboard by including more and more LBGT characters into their films to aide a cause but to me it represents a cultural shift, and that is a good thing. The scene in which the reveal occurs is quick, effective and welcoming. Without causing a stir, I say all this because it reflects diversity and a step forward for future generations.

NE1rhzLifuaH44_1_b

Some of the disappointments I have with ‘Power Rangers‘ has to do with the handling of Rita (Elizabeth Banks) and the poor effects that were done for Goldar. Starting with Rita, I thought she started strong but then was handled in a clunky manner towards the end. There’s one scene, that for anyone who’s watched the film will agree, that had me scratching my head. And for Goldar they could’ve done a better job in the special effects department. One may argue the original costume looks better in comparison for what we got. For a second I thought they used stock footage from ‘Gods of Egypt‘ and how awful the effects were for that. One last thing to mention, there’s a moment when the iconic power rangers music comes on and feels displaced compared to the tone of the film; seeming to appease the diehard fans. Personally, they didn’t need to do that.

Believe it or not I’m curious to see where Saban and Lionsgate take this property next as they’ve put their best foot forward. It’ll be interesting to see which villains are thrown in next and seeing as how the studio may be taking a different approach from the television series. Could we be seeing Lord Zedd in the sequel? Time will tell and fans young and old should enjoy ‘Power Rangers‘ for its vision and charismatic actors. It’s morphin time!!

Rating: 6.8/10

thumbsup

What do you guys think? Are you a fan of the ‘Power Rangers‘? Which era are you a fan of and do you look forward to the reboot? Comment below and share your thoughts?